Saturday, July 20, 2013

Schools of Minnows and Schools of Thought

I was sitting on my dock, looking at the water, trying to figure out why schools of thought are so insular.  Schools of minnows provided the answer.


It is no secret that academic fields have rigid boundaries.  Quiet insularity would be bad enough, but many are belligerent towards other groups, especially others that claim the same territory. Philosophy, literary criticism, and history each have many competing schools of thought.   Social, cultural, biological, clinical, behavioral, cognitive, personality, and developmental psychology are remarkably separate fields.  Cultural and biological anthropologists hardly talk.  Science and postmodernism repel each other as if each had arrays of magnets with north poles facing outwards .  Everyone knows the world would be better if boundaries were more blurry, but interdisciplinary programs come and go, and schools of thought maintain their insularity.  Why? 

I watched a school of minnows swirling in the shallows, flashing silver in gorgeous unison, splitting, then merging, then splitting and merging again.  No choreographer could enforce such gorgeous coordination, but it emerges spontaneously from each minnow swimming steadily towards the constantly moving center of the school. How did selection shaped minnow brain wired to motivate swimming towards the center?   As I watched, one minnow turned right when the group turned left; it was alone for one second, then it was grabbed by a bluegill. 


Humans who stray from the centers of schools of thought don't get snached by predators, but they are often attacked by other humans who are safely within groups, making the territory outside a no-man's-land.  Has this been happening long enough to shape a general tendency to move mentally towards the ideological center of a group?  Or do we all just learn, from experience, that deviation is dangerous, but nonetheless tempting, and sometimes worth it, because the most fertile ground is between the silos. 

6 comments:

jtr said...

Challenge consensus is advice I give my kids and my students. To the extent to which you try new things and go down new roads, people are going to smack you. Remember that independent thinking has a price and the price is persistence. It is very tiring sometimes but can offer big opportunities

Edward Wilson said...

Being in tune and connected to your tribe likely had evolutionary advantages. Being out of tune and disconnected with your tribe may have got you ostracized.
Today being ostracized is unpleasant - ancestrally speaking getting kicked out of your tribe may have been a death sentence. So perhaps being highly motivated to live and breathe exactly in tune with whatever tribe we identify with makes sense from an evolutionary perspective.
That doesn't explain why we are driven to identify with smaller groups and not larger more encompassing ones.
And come to think of it, the bigger the group you identify with, the larger your tribe. This seems like a good thing. Something doesn't add up.

Anonymous said...

Brilliant. I am a medical student who for the past two years have been asking myself this question. Why, in this group of verifiable nerds, is there judgement passed on students who are the slightest bit unique? This provided me with a reminder.

Steve Charli said...

gfhrt6

Anonymous said...

Online institute offers life experience degree accredited for those working students who have much woking experience for their degree they can apply online and get their degree without any difficulty.

Unknown said...

Pacific Cambria University Reviews aid financial supports by providing scholarships programs to deserving students.