Thursday, May 15, 2008

Balancing selection--no answer for schizophrenia

Many have asked why genes that cause such a serious disease persist, and a number of evolutionary hypotheses have been inspired by the kind of balancing selection that explains the persistence of genes that cause sickle cell disease. A new article by Adriaens debunks such hypotheses. He offers a nice review of studies about the reproductive success of people with schizophrenia, although I think he discounts excessively the evolutionary significance of a 50% fitness decrease for male schizophrenics.

It seems to me that he is absolutely right, however,
to point out data that undermine hypotheses based on covert benefits of schizophrenia genes. He generalizes about evolutionary psychiatrists as if they are not only all in one category, but as if they all think the same things. This is especially surprizing given his emphasis on the mistake of assuming that schizophrenia is a natural category. It is so important to criticize hypotheses, not people or groups.

There is much additional useful in his paper, especially his outline of evolutionary reasons why the genetic factors in schizophrenia will be much more complex than we have imagined. This all fits very nicely with other reports this week about the genetics of schizophrenia I do think, however, that we do need to ask why such a highly heritable devastating disorder persists. Balancing selection is not likely. It could be just that new mutations happen. But I think that the high heritability has kept attention focused on the level of the gene, when the problem may well be in constraints and trade-offs at a higher level. See a previous post for more on this.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

"He offers a nice review of studies about the reproductive success of people with schizophrenia, although I think he discounts excessively the evolutionary significance of a 50% fitness decrease for male schizophrenics."

Contemporary reproductive success will likely differ from historical values.
The latter rather than the former is significant for explaining current population composition.
Also note that only a small increase in reproductive success in relatives would be sufficient to outweigh lower fertility of patients. (I've read somewhere that +5% would be sufficient.)

The balanced selection argument can also nicely explain why schizophrenia has been sustained
while the very genes which influence the risks of schizophrenia have undergone strong recent selection pressure. [1]

Furthermore, it is now well established that schizotypy and bipolar disorder, both genetically related to schizophrenia, are positively correlated with creativity.
Note that creative advantages of bipolar genes are rarely casted into doubt --
while having a psychotic relative with one of the two illnesses greatly increases
the likelihood of having the other.

On the cognitive side, schizophrenia leads to low density of dopamine D2 receptors in the thalamus and reduced lateralization. To a lesser extant, these can also be seen in:
a) relatives of schizophrenic patients
b) creative people [2].

Hence, there is both brain-level and behavioral-level evidence for relating schizophrenia to increased creativity in relatives, explaining its evolutionary persistence.

[1] Genetic Markers of Human Evolution Are Enriched in Schizophrenia.
[2] Thinking Outside a Less Intact Box: Thalamic Dopamine D2 Receptor Densities Are Negatively Related to Psychometric Creativity in Healthy Individuals

cheap essay writing service said...

Teaching plays a vital role in the growth of a person as well as the world. It has a vital part in the cost and overall growth of a nation. It empowers the being to take a stand for their thoughts and the actions they are up to. Before moving ahead with its value it is vital to know that teaching is not equivalent to the literacy. The formal school studies are a part of proper education but it can never be the simply trustworthy factor. We have seen a lot of not formally well-informed leaders who have taken the world by storm. They have changed the way; the entire world thinks lives and learns.
Gives Stable Life
All of us need a luxurious and lavish life, but to make that happen we need to be skilled. To lead a relaxed and stable life, the person must know the value of teaching. Many people in unlike parts of the world still believe that teaching is just waste of money. But it is a proven fact that well-read person can handle all the conditions in a better manner than the person who is unskillful.
Get better standard of living
Many people think that teaching cannot take them to the point, where they can fulfill all their dream and hope. But, they do not know that education is the key which creates the verity in one’s life. It is also true that only learning cannot raise the set of living, rather hard work and dedication is equally vital. If a person doe’s hard work after getting higher teaching, no doubt result would be fruitful.
Excels Career Perspective
Teaching is a must for having extra-ordinary carrier chances. An excelling career does not only give you a fat pay job, but also mental liking. No doubt, a well well-read person has chances of getting highly paid jobs. It leads to living a happy and healthy life.
Thus these points brief how vital it is for each one to be skilled. It is vital that we teach the age group so that they can lead a happy life.